
If I were choosing, I would probably discuss this film using race discourse/ethnic studies or from a postcolonial point-of-view. However, my role this week is to apply a feminist "lens" to this documentary, so I'll try my best.
From a feminist critical perspective one of the elements I found most compelling was the differences in self-expression between the female and male krumpers. The female roles were much more sexualized. This was particularly obvious when the women started stripping off extra clothing and pouring water on themselves during the competition between the clowners and the krumpers. This is definitely something students could discuss in the classroom. They might compare the one male participant who stripped off his shirt and the claims krumping welcomes all people regardless of appearance. (Though not all races.)
I also found the "stripper dance" segment particularly disturbing. It seemed ludicrous to me that the young girl claimed she was unfamiliar with it's origins. Furthermore, I do not agree with the boy who defended young girls (6 or 7 yrs) dancing like that. This would also make an interesting topic for debate for students.
No comments:
Post a Comment